BLUETTI AC200P vs BLUETTI AC240
These are not the same class. One carries noticeably more battery than the other, so this is really a question about how much power you need rather than which brand builds better.
One is a size up
BLUETTI AC200P holds around a third more battery — 2000Wh against 1,536Wh — and that is what decides how long either one lasts on the same load.
BLUETTI AC240 has the higher ceiling, 2,400W, 2 outlets against 2000W, 6 outlets — enough to matter only if your load list sits right between the two.
BLUETTI AC200P is the lighter of the two at 60.6 lbs, by 12.2 lb.
BLUETTI AC240 takes 1,200W of solar against 700W, which only matters if a panel is your way back to full — and matters a great deal if it is.
BLUETTI AC240 refills faster from the wall, accepting 2,200W against 500W.
Drawn from 9 specifications each maker publishes, of which 9 differ. We have not handled either machine — see our methodology.
Side by side
| Specification | BLUETTI AC200P | BLUETTI AC240 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery capacity | 2000Whbetter | 1,536Wh |
| AC output | 2000W, 6 outlets | 2,400W, 2 outletsbetter |
| Max solar input | 700W | 1,200Wbetter |
| AC input | 500W | 2,200Wbetter |
| Weight | 60.6 lbsbetter | 33kg / 72lbs |
| Dimensions | 16.5×11.0×15.2 in | 16.5 × 11.6 × 16.1in |
| USB-C output | 1 × 60W max | 2 × 100W max |
| AC outlets | 6 x 120V/20A Receptacle, 2,000W In | 2 x 120V/20A Outlets |
| Warranty | 48 Months (Enter to learn more about our) | 6 Years |
What the extra battery buys you
Watt-hours are hard to picture, so here is each pack as runtime on the loads a machine this size is usually bought for. Both columns assume 85% inverter efficiency — the conservative end of what these are rated at — so read every figure as a floor.
| Load | BLUETTI AC200P | BLUETTI AC240 |
|---|---|---|
| Full-size fridge (150W average) | 11 hours | 8.7 hours |
| Chest freezer (100W average) | 17 hours | 13 hours |
| Gas furnace blower (400W) | 4.3 hours | 3.3 hours |
| Sump pump, intermittent (300W average) | 5.7 hours | 4.4 hours |
| Space heater on low (750W) | 2.3 hours | 1.7 hours |
From solar alone, at 70% of the panel input each maker quotes — a realistic day rather than a lab figure — the BLUETTI AC200P needs about 4.1 hours of good sun to refill , and the BLUETTI AC240 about 1.8 hours.
Published by only one of them
A figure missing from a spec sheet is not a zero — it is a number the maker chose not to state. These appear on one page and not the other, so they cannot be compared, only noted.
- BLUETTI AC200P — Cell chemistry: LiFePO4
- BLUETTI AC240 — Cycle life: 3,500+ cycles to 80%
- BLUETTI AC240 — USB-A output: 2 × 18W max
Where this comparison stops
Everything above is what the makers publish, not what either machine did in front of us. We own neither, so there is no noise measurement, no thermal behaviour under sustained load, and no view on how either holds up after two years. Makers also measure differently — cycle life at 80% capacity is not the same test as cycle life at 70% — so figures that look comparable sometimes are not. Treat this as a way to build a shortlist quickly, and read the caveats on our methodology page before you let a number decide.
Check current prices
Neither figure above is a price. These two move independently and often, and whichever is discounted this week is usually the answer when the specifications are as close as they are here.
- BLUETTI AC200P on Amazon — search results for this model, as we do not have its listing on file
- BLUETTI AC240 on Amazon — search results for this model, as we do not have its listing on file
Affiliate links: we earn a commission on purchases made through them, at no extra cost to you. See our disclosure.
More on these
- Best 1000 Watt Portable Power Station
- Best 1000Wh Portable Power Station
- Best 2000 Watt Portable Power Station
- Best 2000Wh Portable Power Stations (2026)
- Best Expandable Portable Power Station
Specifications retrieved 2026-09-17 from bluettipower.com. Figures change without notice; check the maker's page before buying.